Their benefactors were sneaky, of course, but I was surprised to learn that Bep spent hours socializing with the Franks in the annex.
C 2025 Ancestry Worship - Genealogy BlogSpot
I've posted a number of pretty charts that may inspire you when you have completed your research and are ready to calligraphy or print neatly.
This may surprise you but I don't like ANY of the free research charts that are offered by big genealogy databases or genealogy clubs that I've found. I mean are the ones you use while you're doing your research.
My main reasons are:
NOT ENOUGH ROOM : Lines or boxes too close together. To handprint or type in these you may have to read with a magnifying glass.
PRESUMPTONS ABOUT HOW MANY CHILDREN BORN IN A FAMILY. Some family group forms are limited to two pages. There isn't even an option to list more than seven children such as a third or fourth page.
BAPTISMAL DATES MORE IMPORTANT THAN BIRTH DATES. One of my big issues is that the what is more important to genealogy is the birth date. When every child in the village seems to have been baptized within days of its birth, OK, maybe that's not too far off, but I've found the baptismals that took place months after the birth too. In the databases the baptismal date is being used instead. This means you have to read the originals and go back and forth a few months at least. Some of these forms are overly religious to me.
THE SOLUTION? Just type it out, neatly, and KEEP CONSISTANT TO YOUR OWN FORMAT.
C 2025 Ancestry Worship Genealogy BlogSpot All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights.
Q : I have gone like gang-busters on all my lines but one, my dad's mother's mother. The name is common and I found two candidates. How do I decide which one to go with? I'll explain.
I found her parents marriage (my great-grandparents) which had the ages of the bride and groom in a Roman Catholic church record in Slovakia. The bride, Maria, is listed as age 20 in 1888. That would make about 1868 the date of Maria's birth.
Maria #1 is recorded born and baptized in the same church record as her descendants. (Her husband was born elsewhere but in the same general area - just a different church.) However, the only Maria candidate in that church record was not born in 1868 but in 1869. As her groom is listed as age 24, and his birth/baptism is correct as proven by his birth/baptismal, it doesn't seem to me that she might be a bride who wished to appear younger than her groom or anything like that. The wedding was in mid November and her birthday was in September.
Maria #2 is not in the same church record as her descendants. But again is the same general area, just a different church. Again I found that this Maria is not born in 1868. In this case she is born and baptized in 1867... I went back and found her parent's marriage and that was when I realized that her mother was very pregnant with her when they married. She was born about a month later. Therefore I can imagine that by claiming to be older than she was, she might have been hiding the fact that her parents "had to get married."
I used FamilySearch database for my research and other candidates are not coming up.
Help!
Lisa
A: I see the dilemma Lisa. It is compelling to think that Maria #2 gave a wrong age at marriage because she wanted to hide her parent's need to get married when pregnant with her. However, it is also compelling to find the birth/baptism of the bride in the same church record, though it's possible the groom met his bride elsewhere. In either case we are speculating when creating a story about what happened. I do it all the time as I'm interested in the story - the culture - the society - which includes religion and expectations upon women. And sometimes that speculation - a hunch - a synchronicity - leads us to the documents we want.
As a side I once read that an infertile wife was so unwanted that a first pregnancy without marriage was actually desirable by some.
I looked at the records you referred me to and I think that the first Maria is your best candidate. However, in writing my book I would provide the genealogy for both Maria's with an explanation for why you did that. Remember that we write our books in a way that our reader can follow us and so can another person who may go further with that information if and when more documents are available. State it as a fact that you have two candidates and why.
This is also a case where maybe the answer is in DNA as it's always possible that the man who married the pregnant bride was not the father of her child. I always say that we would still want to do the genealogy anyway because if there is a "match" with DNA an the relationship is given, you still want to figure out who is who. (As these are a set of your great-grandparents, it's not as easy as finding out who a birth parent is where a parent, sibling, or half sibling could be revealed.)
Because there are some church books that have not been indexed by FamilySearch, and some handwriting is sloppy enough for a transcriber to make errors however, and the deaths and marriages are not Indexed for Slovakia which was Hungary in 1888, I would, to have peace of mind, also look for a possible Mary in the church where the groom's birth/baptism was located and around at other parishes in the area. Last but not least, do also consider the names of villages and house numbers as well as the godparents when making the decision.
Love your research!
Christine
Ancestry Worship - Genealogy BlogSpot 2025
This is a tremendous book about the history of residency on Terminal Island which is now part of the Los Angeles Harbor complex, one of the largest deep water ports in the world. The photographs and images and the story of how people made use of the resources takes us back to a pre-industrial time and then moves us forward to the development of the port. Surprises abound: the squatters shacks, burials of sailors, and an artist's colony, including a women's writing establishment. Then an important fishing village built by Japanese immigrants and the beginnings of the canned tuna enterprise developed, first fisherman, then their families.
The book is especially strong in describing the history of the Japanese immigrants and what happened after Pearl Harbor was bombed and the United States government moved the people to internment camps.
I attended the presentation by the authors at Los Angeles Public Library Central, and then read the book page by page, rich with artistic and photographic displays.
For the purposes of this genealogy blog, I want to focus a bit on the authors research. In the acknowledgements it mentions that besides the individuals with a personal or familial history who were interviewed and contributed, including photographs from their own collections, a number of libraries and archives were consulted. Many of you forget to contact the local libraries, historical societies, and colleges so perhaps this will be an inspiration.
Who would have thought that Los Angeles Harbor College would have an archive that according to the authors, "opened an archive into another world for us." Additionally the San Pedro Historical Society helped with getting back issues of the local newspaper News-Pilot. Also mentioned was the Rosemead Library's Asian Pacific Resource Center for microfilmed issues of Rafu Shimpo dating back to 1919. California State University - Dominguez Hills Archives and Special Collections, Taiji Historical Archives, California State Historical Society, Los Angeles Public Library, Los Angeles Times (newspaper), UCLA Special Collections, Japanese American National Museum, California History Room of the California State Library, Autry National Center - Braun Research Library, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Huntington Library. Port of Los Angeles Archives was especially helpful. Have you heard of all of these?
One of the things I thought of as most helpful for Japanese-American genealogy was the 1912 map of the island, showing the layout of streets and houses - with the full names of the residents - that was probably prepared before the removal of the squatters.
I thought about was how these people, the squatters, created homes from lumber and driftwood on land they didn't have to buy or rent, which is what our homeless are doing too. From these squatters sprung some people who became important to the history of the city of Los Angeles
All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights