Design their own house?
What was your room like?
What was Grandma's house like?
Author Judith Giesberg calls these people "The Freedom Generation."
Allow me to give you some back-story on this. As you may know, after emancipation from slavery, former enslaved people were allowed to have bank accounts and own land and property (though they were often segregated when it came to where, per localities), and also allowed to legally marry (though there were rituals of commitment and sometimes services to unite slaves, (per the slave owners values and discretion). However, in those times communications traveled slowly, very slowly compared to these days when even "snail mail" has been replaced by electronic bill paying and e-mail and unlimited long distance cell phone use. Because some slaves were sold and resold or moved along, they were often out of communication entirely. The Underground Railroad moved people to freedom. The Civil War also scattered people, including those who had been part of the military or escaped to the Union while soldiering. Upon emancipation, some had no means to move from the place they had been enslaved while others took any means possible to move elsewhere. The years passed.
You may also know about President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the Great Depression, and his New Deal which resulted in federal funds being used for projects such as the Federal Writer's Project. One of the projects that writers participated in was interviewing former slaves. These writings appear in databases as "SLAVE NARRATIVES." (At my local library this database is available and searchable.) Author Giesberg search through those testimonials as well as doing research in archives for now historical newspaper advertisements and such and brought forth some stories that might break your heart too.
Some people searched for decades, not only placing ads in newspapers but traveling and networking, asking ministers and local politicians who might be inclined to help them search. Some were successful, others not. (Through genealogy that search continues.)
In the Introduction of this book, Giesberg writes, "Tens of thousands of children were taken from their mothers and fathers over the four decades of the Second Middle Passage" and "Chance meetings of formerly enslaved people were rare."
Excerpt page 65 -
"Among the one million people sold from the Upper to the Lower South before 1860, thousands were children sold alone. According to historian Edward Baptist, between 1815 and 1820, 2,646 children under the age of thirteen were sold in New Orleans out of a total of 12,370 sales. Of their number 1,001 were sold alone."
Giesberg writes about the emotional and psychological effects that being sold away or sent away had on children and families as an aspect of her explorations of slavery in this book. Today, we find child trafficking and child labor to be abhorrent. I will say that that children who were not enslaved were also trafficked and many went to work both in Europe and the America's very young, especially before public education. That was tied in with shorter lifespans and the fact that the age of thirteen was generally thought to be the onset of adulthood; some say being a "teenager" is also a recent experience and back in the day you were either a child or an adult. It was also an aspect of a rural or agricultural society in which large families put everyone to work in some capacity, of informal apprenticeships, and very little time to play. So we're all evolving and rejecting notions that were acceptable in the past.
This is one more book I highly recommend for its extensive researched historical content and value to anyone who wants to be inspired.
C 2026 Ancestry Worship - Genealogy All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights
Imagine being a slave and being told you will go to war, the Civil War, for the Confederacy, by the person who owns you! If a researcher finds that their ancestors who was enslaved was in the war, they may wonder "did he see action?"
The answer, generally but emphatically, is NO. Confederate law prohibited it. Yet, there were reports that this was so. And, there was always the possibility that a person who was forced to follow the troops as a cook or another useful supportive role could use that opportunity to escape or go north and join the Union Army! There is also another consideration. What if the person was a Free Person of Color and then joined up?
So, some of the things a researcher wants to do is to verify which company/troop the person fought in. Check the census or other records to see if that person reports being disabled or is not working for money after the war. Also see where they are living after that war.
AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD TRUST : BLACK CONFEDERATES - TRUTH Excellent article!
I've posted about the Freedman * Bank Records before, but did you know that the Freedman Bureau also kept a record of former slaves (and some "free colored") who married soon after they were free from enslavement?
In the past I've also posted on some methodology for African-American research, stating first of all it is American research and one ought to proceed with going back as neatly as possible, using census records, both federal and state, if possible. If a researcher can find their people on the census after liberation, they have some names. Other than that, there may be some oral history in the family but one must be careful to accept stories without some proofing. Our African-American cautionary tale is that upon liberation, a person could choose to change their surname and some did more than once, wanting to feel comfortable with that surname, and sometimes various family members chose various names. That said, I wonder how often that happened.
I explored this database for a few hours recently and want to give you some information that may be helpful.
So for the purposes of this post I'm using the Ancestry TM genealogy database. To find the database called Freedman Bureau Marriage Records you want to go into NEW COLLECTIONS (WHICH ACTUALLY ALLOWS YOU TO SEARCH THE ENTIRE CATALOG, not just recently added collections. You will see to the top left the words CARD CATALOG.) Put the word Freedman in the keyword search. You will see that you can search the U.S.,Freedman's Bureau Records, 1865-1878
Then to the right bottom it says U.S., Freedmen's Bureau Marriage Records 1845-1867
Remember that the NATIONAL ARCHIVES of THE UNITED STATES is usually the original or primary source for databases.
While the other records held in the overall records can be interesting, because if you may be able to find out who a plantation owner was, I like to focus on marriages because you have twice the chance of recognizing someone as an ancestor - a bride or a groom. This may give you the name of a female ancestor by her married and maiden name.
My first impression was that I was able to easily pull up records without knowing any particular name simply by putting in the state. I also tried common names such as Smith, Watson, or Jefferson.
The database includes many states including, according to the database:You may find that your local library has AMERICAN ANCESTORS GENEALOGY DATABASE. To begin using this new database: According to my library, this database includes birth, death, marriage, and census records of those who were enslaved as well as family members.
Go to 10 MILLION NAMES.
This is a database in progress: CEDAR GROVE PLANTATION, a very large plantation, is the first plantation to be included and IT IS ARRANGED BY PLANTATION or ESTATE.
CEDAR GROVE PLANTATION is currently privately owned historical site in Huntersville, Mecklenburg, county, North Carolina and was built in the early 1830's by James G. Torrance.
There are a good number of posts and links of interest to those who have slavery in their family history here at ANCESTRY WORSHIP - GENEALOGY. I look forward to using this database and would like to hear from those of you who use it!
If you know about a Message in a Bottle that was washed ashore, or any Time Capsules that have been opened recently, or any Love Letters that took decades to arrive in the mail, I'd like to hear about them. Comment!
I'm interested. I love that stuff!
RECLAIM THE RECORDS- NEW JERSEY SEARCH
New Jersey - so near New York - is what I call a difficult state. I do believe in privacy laws and I know there is good reason to have them. However, I have come to think that some town librarians in that state have basically been stubborn about allowing collections that should be available to be filmed or digitalized. New Jersey is a historically important Colonial state, involved in the American Revolution and the Civil War. Those records seem to be available. But more modern ones - not so!
Have fun with RECLAIM THE RECORDS and see what's new!
*** As a note. New Jersey research often links to New York and Pennsylvania, as well as some other states. Check especially when your ancestors lived hear state borders! For instance, one ancestor who lived their life in New Jersey, spent their last years in a Pennsylvania retirement home and their death certificate was from Pennsylvania.
*** The New Jersey State Archives may be helpful.
C 2026 Ancestry Worship - Genealogy
Some of my ancestry lived in New Jersey. New Jersey is a rather difficult state due to privacy laws and such. I remember years ago sending money orders to New Jersey for the death and other records that would "prove" what I had come up with and they were returned. Basically, if I didn't already know the information, then I could not have that information. Other researchers have told me about dealing with New Jersey (as well as New Mexico) and basically this is why I check certain paid databases every few months to see what, if anything, has shown up.
• Taken every 10 years on years that ended with a 5 (1855, 1865, and 1875 are incomplete).
• Certain individual counties have been indexed: Hunterdon County in 1875; Monmouth County in 1875 (available on-line at the Monmouth County Archives web site); and 1885 Camden (excluding city)
• Searchable database for Atlantic and Passaic Counties in 1885 available on our web site. These counties are the only ones we search through the mail.
• Complete 1895 State Census is available on www.ancestry.com.
• The indexes to 1885, 1905 and 1915 State Censuses are available on www.familysearch.com.
C 2026 Ancestry Worship - Genealogy All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights
OTHER RESOURCES FOR NEW JERSEY might be found through the genealogy activist group RECLAIM THE RECORDS:
C 2026 Ancestry Worship - Genealogy BlogSpot
Readers please note that I've changed the names given by this reader due to a need for privacy.
Q: I'm looking at some information on the Internet that was added to a genealogy database by someone else, someone I don't know. This concerns my great-great grandmother in Arkansas. My great-great grandmother is listed as Mary Johnson, Formerly Marie Smith. Someone else posted Mary Johnson was Formerly Marie Walker. What does this mean?
Thanks,
Alice
A: Hello Alice.
I find the way that information was posted as a bit strange - and confusing - as if the postings came from stories or rumors rather than genealogy research. "Formerly" could mean this was a previous surname or previous married name. And as you found the same woman also listed by someone else as "Formerly" with yet another surname, it could be that your great-great grandmother was married twice. Also this could indicate an informal or formal name change. Or an adoption.
Let's go over this:
First, we cannot believe everything that is posted on the Internet or on databases that offer individuals to post their research (or family stories or rumors), especially when no documents are attached, especially because I see these errors uploaded to multiple genealogy sites.
Secondly, the history of name changes in Arkansas is that informal (common law) name changes were recognized for some time, even when the process of legal (court ordered) name changes was introduced in 1851. In other words, she could have changed her name because she wanted to, without being married, widowed, or divorced, and without a legal proceeding.
So, I would suggest that you try to get a birth certificate or church record of her birth/baptism and see what it says. I would also suggest you try to get a death certificate or cemetery/funeral home document. And of course, any evidence of her marriage or marriages through marriage certificates. I trust you have traced her back as far as you can go with census records as well.
1830 is the first Federal Census for that state and you can also check the State Census' which were done in 1823,1829.1865, and 1911.
There are better ways to indicate that a woman is being listed by her maiden name.
Instead of the word "formerly"
Marie "Mary" Johnson née Marie Smith
Marie "Mary" Johnson born Marie Smith
Marie "Mary" Smith - Johnson
Marie "Mary" Smith, wife of Jed Johnson
Mrs. Marie "Mary" Johnson, born Marie Walker
Ask yourself, which of these forms is least confusing and most informative!
Keep Researching!
Christine
C 2026 Ancestry Worship - Genealogy All Rights Reserved
This is going to be a SERIES of POSTS and so I'm going to designate a TAG that will (eventually) bring them ALL up!
The TAG WILL BE "STATE CENSUS ADVENTURE"
C 2026 Ancestry Worship - Genealogy All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights.
UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU : LIST OF STATE CENSUS' go to the full list which is referenced from the Ann S. Lainhart's Sate Census Records * book. I've highlighted where the census would bridge between the Federal 1880 and Federal 1900. However, I think if a state census is available, a researcher should look at every census that would provide information on the family.
These state census may help you determine WHERE AND WHEN A FAMILY MOVED ADDRESSES and, depending on the census may provide information that is interesting or important.
Again, do the historical research so you know WHEN THE STATE BECAME A STATE!
And consider ALTERNATIVES TO FEDERAL OR STATE CENSUS: ie SPECIAL CENSUS
****We're going to look at some states from here forwards!
* Genealogy Angel
The TAG FOR THIS SERIES IS "STATE CENSUS ADVENTURE"
C 2026 Ancestry Worship - Genealogy All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights
IF IT WAS NOT A STATE YET IT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO ANY FEDERAL CENSUS! OR ANY STATE CENSUS. But other census may exist. Do the HISTORICAL RESEARCH to see exactly WHEN a territory became a state and consider that it might have not been populated enough yet to be considered worth doing a census there... Or, as in the case of CALIFORNIA, the state might have decided it was worth doing regularly.
California - 1788, 1790, 1796, 1797-98, 1816, 1836, 1844, 1852. (YEARS OF "CENSUS" but note that the first and only STATE CENSUS is 1852.)
California History : 1848 was the Mexican Cession following the Mexican-American War, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Gold Rush 1848. 1849 Constitutional Convention.
Remember that the PURPOSE OF A CENSUS IS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE POPULATION. The Federal Census asks different questions every ten years. Purposes can include : Decisions on FUNDING - how money from taxes will be used for schools and education. How many people rent or own their home? How many women are employed to earn money for their own or family financial support? What sort of jobs are available in the area? Does the area attract immigrants? How many people are citizens or not?
HERE IS WHAT THE CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY - CENSUS page has to say!
Excerpt: The first federal census conducted in California was taken in 1850, while the Gold Rush was in full swing. Adventurers were pouring into the state, and they were very mobile in their search for the next paydirt. As a result, the accuracy of the count was questionable. Also, records for the counties of Contra Costa, San Francisco, and Santa Clara were lost or destroyed. To obtain a more reliable picture of the population, the State of California conducted its own census in 1852, the only one in the state’s history. The original census is housed at the State Archives, but it is available on microfilm in the California History Room. Because the microfilm is difficult to read, the Daughters of the American Revolution of California created a transcription of the census, as well as an index. The California History Room has both print and microfilm copies of the transcription.
***
OK - so now we're going to find the resource for these earlier-pre-state records which turn out to be baptismal, marriages, and burials!
HUNTINGTON ORG : EARLY CALIFORNIA POPULATION PROJECT - DATABASES
This is going to be a SERIES of POSTS and so I'm going to designate a TAG that will (eventually) bring them ALL up!
The TAG WILL BE "STATE CENSUS ADVENTURE"
C 2026 Ancestry Worship - Genealogy All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights
You may know the saying "The United States Census (meaning FEDERAL) is the BACKBONE of AMERICAN GENEALOGY." While we wait and wait and wait for the 72 years that must pass before the 1960 census is revealed (April 1, 1960) to the public for the first time because we DO respect privacy (back in the day when privacy rights were understood as rights very few people lived past 72 years old) we can look back on previous census...It's true that the FEDERAL CENSUS is the BACKBONE... though the 1890 barely exists... But it depends on what state and county you're researching too. The very LAST United States STATE CENSUS WAS IN 1985, and in Massachusetts.
State census' certainly can help "fill the gap" when the 1890 census that you need is missing forever.
So first, let's go to the NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF THE UNITED STATES for the definitive statement about what happened and what still exists!
Here is the general consensus! : fragments (that offer only a small percentage of the original data) are surviving for specific counties and townships in the states of Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas, plus a special schedule for Civil War veterans and widows.NATIONAL ARCHIVES RESEARCH CENSUS This is in more detail...
Excerpt: On January 10, 1921, a fire in the Commerce Department building, Washington, DC, resulted in the destruction of most of the 1890 census, to the woe of researchers ever since.
***
If you're researching KENTUCKY or OKLAHOMA you have half a chance! But, interestingly, the census of CIVIL WAR widows and some items of interests to Native Americans and African Americans are available. Forget WEST VIRGINIA! There has never been a state census in that state!
***
This is going to be a SERIES of POSTS and so I'm going to designate a TAG that will (eventually) bring them ALL up!
The TAG WILL BE "STATE CENSUS ADVENTURE"
C 2026 Ancestry Worship - Genealogy All Rights Reserved including Internet and International Rights
As the new year begins, I want to welcome new readers and say hello to old readers. When I began this blog I had no idea I would continue with it for so many years! Since I never loose my interest in genealogy - and subjects that go hand in hand with it such as history - I always find researching and writing for this blog to be ever interesting and enjoyable.
ANCESTRY WORSHIP - GENEALOGY BLOGSPOT
is for you if...
You want to learn about professional genealogy standards from someone with many years of experience.
You're interested in history, particularly of the United States and Europe.
You need help breaking through a research block.
Feel free to look through my archives! There's lots of good information there.
In order to bring up posts of interest, there are a few different ways to do that in Blogger.
First you can click on any TAG (the words at the bottom of a post) and that will bring up all posts that have that TAG.
Secondly, you can use the SEARCH feature embedded in the start page to being up posts using a word.
Thirdly, you can click on the year and month to bring up ARCHIVED POSTS.
If you have any ideas for subjects you'd like me to cover, or if you have any Questions, you can leave a COMMENT. I read all of them before deciding to publish so this gives you an opportunity to provide information or suggestions without concern that I will publish it; simply write DO NOT PUBLISH when you use COMMENT and I will respect your wishes!
Christine